Requests from dead reach wide audience

Requests from dead reach wide audience

These are among thousands of emotional, humorous, sometimes snarky requests inserted into published obituaries, attributed to the deceased or their families. And though complete strangers have always been among the audiences for messages from beyond the grave, digital death notices mean they now reach far beyond family and friends to people around the world.

“It takes just one funny, unusual or touching line for an obituary to go viral,” said Katie Falzone, director of operations for Legacy.com, which compiles and archives death notices.

That was the case last month after the death of staunch Republican Larry Upright of Kannapolis, North Carolina, whose obituary ended with the line: “The family respectfully asks that you do not vote for Hillary Clinton in 2016. R.I.P. Grandaddy.”

That bit of stumping won national attention and all kinds of comments on the funeral home’s website and on social media. News accounts were tweeted, retweeted and referenced on Facebook and viewed on YouTube tens of thousands of times.

“We got some sweet responses and we got some nasty responses,” said Upright’s wife, Colleen. “But we’re Uprights, and that just rolls off our backs.”

There have been other politics-oriented dying requests in recent years: to vote for George W. Bush and to support his removal from office; to donate to President Barack Obama and to support “anyone but Obama”; to vote Democratic and to support the tea party.

After 24-year-old Molly Parks of Manchester, New Hampshire, died last month from a heroin overdose, her obituary also spread through cyberspace, fueled by the brokenhearted pleas of her father.

“If you have any loved ones who are fighting addiction, Molly’s family asks that you do everything possible to be supportive, and guide them to rehabilitation before it is too late,” he wrote.

Most of the requests from the dead have to do with the ceremonies of death.

Bob Harrar of Orlando, Florida, who died in December, put these instructions into his obit: “Make sure you don’t give my ashes to my mother. She’ll put them in a drawer with my grandparents.”

Milton Miller of Little Rock, Arkansas, left word that anyone feeling sad about his passing should “mix a beverage of your choice and hum the Razorback fight song.”

Garland Babcock of Anchorage, Alaska, left very specific instructions to have his ashes “put in an old trucker’s Thermos and driven in a red Chevy truck to Monterey Bay, California.”

And the obituary for Larry Sajko of Port Richey, Fla., said, “Larry requests no cellphones at his service.”

When Christian “Lou” Hacker died last month in Valatie, New York, his obituary said he left behind “a hell of a lot of stuff his wife and daughter have no idea what to do with.”

So they told readers, “If you’re looking for car parts for a Toyota, BMW, Triumph, Dodge or Ford between the years of about 1953-2013, or maybe half a dozen circular saws, still in their boxes with the Home Depot receipts attached, you should wait the appropriate amount of time and get in touch.”

Hacker’s wife, Mina, said this past week that the invitation was “mostly a joke and no one has taken us up on it.”

“Actually, it will take us a while to decide what to do,” she said. “Everything is attached to a memory.”

When “in lieu of flowers” appears in an obituary, it typically requests donations to a favorite charity of the deceased.

But it’s also been attached to a variety of strange requests.

“In lieu of flowers, tune up your car and check the air pressure in your tires — he would have wanted that,” read the 2011 obituary for B.H. Spratt of Ponte Vedra Beach, Fla.

And these:

“In lieu of flowers, the family asks that if you smoke, try quitting at least one more time.”

“In lieu of flowers, if you knew ‘Bud,’ he would want you to mix yourself a Manhattan.”

“In lieu of flowers, buy a lottery ticket. You might be lucky.”

Thomas Taylor of Durham, N.C., was apparently hoping to get some money back after his death. Taylor died in 2008, nine years after making his funeral arrangements.

His obituary said one of Taylor’s last requests “was to contact the Cremation Society to ask for a refund because he knew he weighed at least 20 percent less than when he paid for his arrangements.”

AP news researcher Rhonda Shafner contributed to this report.

Digital Assets & Estate Planning: More Relevant Than You Might Think

Digital Assets & Estate Planning: More Relevant Than You Might Think

Defining Digital Assets

Consider for a moment how much your daily activities have an online component? From banking and bill paying to multiple email accounts – if something were to happen to you tomorrow, would your fiduciary have the necessary access to handle your password-protected and often encrypted digital life?

What exactly does this term “digital assets” entail and how is it relevant to estate planning? As technology has become embedded in most aspects of our daily lives, you may be hard pressed to think of someone who does not have at least some online presence and/or digital property. The term encompasses email, social media and other online accounts; digital photos, downloaded music and other files stored on the cloud.  It also entails valuable content stored on personal devices and, maybe even in some cases, blog content and valuable domain names. Essentially, the term “digital assets” refers to intangible assets with sentimental value and perhaps even financial value.

Current & Proposed Law

The disjointed laws around fiduciary access to digital assets further muddy this already cloudy area of estate planning. Understandably, laws in this area have not kept pace with technology and its ever-increasing role in our daily lives. Privacy, copyright and intellectual property laws intersect with federal and state law on the matter resulting in confusion as to legal authority over a decedent’s digital assets. While a handful of states have passed some clarifying laws, the governing law in most cases dates back to 1986 regulations on unauthorized access of computer hardware and stored devices. Certainly these lawmakers could not have imagined how integrated our digital and daily lives would become. Furthermore, procedures for handling decedents’ accounts are often addressed in individual provider Terms of Service agreements and can vary dramatically by provider. As we hurriedly click through and accept new terms of service, do we have any idea what will happen to our email or social media accounts upon our deaths?

To rectify the situation, a national committee of attorneys appointed by the Uniform Law Commission is currently drafting proposed legislation to be known as the Fiduciary Access to Digital Assets Act. The primary purpose of the Act will be to grant fiduciaries (executors, trustees and agents under power of attorney) the power “to access, manage, distribute, copy, or delete digital assets and accounts.” The committee is attempting to work through the inherent difficulties in balancing the effectiveness of the Act from a practical perspective while respecting constitutional privacy laws.

How Does It Impact Me?

In the meantime, what should we do? First, identify your digital assets.  Some experts recommend storing this “inventory” in an encrypted file with instructions for accessing the file kept securely with your original estate documents or in a safe box. Second, think about access to these assets after you are gone. Do you want your executor to be able to access your personal accounts? Would having access to your online accounts provide ease of administering your estate? Would your family and close friends find comfort in accessing your online photo archives? Some companies have begun offering digital “afterlife” services such as EstateAssist.com, the Legacy Locker and Data Inheritance. In spite of the possibility of inherent security and viability risks with such providers, they may offer a better alternative to the often out-of-date and unsecured password sheet many keep in their desks. Another alternative, if utilizing a password manager program such as Dashlane for PCs or 1Password for MACs, is to keep log on credentials to your password manager in a safe box. Additionally, many attorneys advise specifically granting your fiduciary the right to manage – access, control and delete – digital assets in estate planning documents. These steps may not be a panacea until the laws evolve; but they’re likely to increase ease of estate administration while also demonstrating testator intent with regard to these assets.

With access, a fiduciary will be able to more effectively distribute, memorialize or eliminate the digital assets as appropriate. In some cases, eliminating accounts can be an important deterrent for identity theft. Sadly, it is not beyond identity thieves to exploit the identities of the deceased.

The importance of planning for digital assets will only continue to grow as our reliance on technology increases. As with most estate planning, the most effective approach is to plan ahead.  If you are interested in additional practical information on this topic, we recommend Your Digital Afterlife by Evan Carroll & John Romano.

It is worth noting that even where estate documents grant fiduciary access to electronic and stored communications, the fiduciary may still be in violation of privacy and fraud prevention laws as well as individual terms of service agreements until more current laws are enacted. However, there are no reported cases of the Department of Justice or a state prosecuting a fiduciary for unauthorized access to a deceased or disabled’s digital access.  Nonetheless, the threat of criminal penalty does exist and experts predict it’s an issue that may end up in the courts.

Resources:

  • Carter, “Pixar for Estate Planners,” ACTEC Presentation to the Wake County Estate Planning Council, November 2014
  • Bissett & Kauffman, “Surf the Evolving Web of Laws Affecting Digital Assets,” 41 Estate Planning Journal 4, April 2014
  • Prangley, Haller & Coventry, “Web of Estate Planning Considerations for Digital Assets,” 40 Estate Planning Journal 5, May 2013

Jennifer Jones is a Trust & Estate Advisor at TrueWealth, LLC, a wealth management firm located in Atlanta. She has over 13 years of experience in tax and planning, combined with experience in trust administration. She can be reached at jjones@truewealth.com or 404.487.0518.

This communication is not intended as accounting, tax or legal advice and is not a substitute for an opinion from your tax and legal advisor on specific issues applicable to you.  Please consult with your CPA for specific guidance on your personal planning and an attorney for legal advice. You may elect unilaterally to follow or ignore completely, or in any part, any information, recommendation, or advice given by TrueWealth Management and its affiliates. 

How to Digitally Avoid Taking It to the Grave

How to Digitally Avoid Taking It to the Grave

But in the era of smartphones and cloud computing services, that same stuff may be stored in digital formats on servers scattered across the globe. You may keep documents online or use email as a catchall for paperless receipts, insurance information or financial transactions. And don’t forget the photos, videos and musings left behind at social media sites like Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn and Flickr.

So how do you make sure all that information — protected by who knows how many passwords — is handled the way you would like after you’re gone? Two words: Plan ahead.

Providers that store digital content are restricted in how they can disclose it to someone other than the account holder. Much of it is protected by privacy laws. And terms of service agreements for things like free email may prevent companies from disclosing that material to anyone without a court order.

“We are in a gray area right now where the technology has progressed faster than the laws,” said Laura E. Hoexter, an estate-planning lawyer at the law firm Helsell Fetterman in Seattle.

Some states have passed laws to address aspects of these issues. For example, a 2013 Virginia law makes it easier for family members to see content in cases of the death of a minor. And the Delaware Legislature just this week passed a bill that seeks to ease access to content.

The Uniform Law Commission, a nonprofit association that looks for ways to bring about uniformity in important areas of law, is also working on a law that could eventually apply to all states.

The commission wants to ease access to content while also honoring a user’s privacy wishes. It hopes all 50 states will adopt its proposal so a single set of guidelines would standardize the process for users, providers and heirs, said Suzanne Walsh, chairwoman of the committee drafting the law, called the Uniform Fiduciary Access to Digital Assets Act.

While the legal issues are being untangled you can plan ahead. Google, for example, offers a tool to help its users deal with the problem. Called Inactive Account Manager, it allows you to designate up to 10 people to receive content from sources like your mail, documents or blogs. You may also choose to have content deleted after you have died.

When the account becomes inactive, your designees are notified and receive the content you chose to share. They do not receive a means of logging in to your account.

Some lawyers view Google’s planning tool as a model to emulate.

“Other companies haven’t started doing this yet, but I’m hopeful they will,” said James D. Lamm, an estate-planning lawyer at Gray Plant Mooty, a law firm in Minneapolis and the author of digitalpassing.com, a blog that tracks these issues.

And if companies aren’t doing this for you, one of the surest ways to pass on content is to keep copies on your computer. You can make a habit of saving copies of important documents, sentimental photos, Facebook content or purchased content like music. One handy tool to capture web content is called ScrapBook, a free Firefox extension created by Taiga Gomibuchi, a programmer in Tokyo.

But if you download, make sure your material is secure. That means backing up to an external drive with programs like Apple’s Time Machine, or File History in Windows 8. Also, encrypt your computer’s disk and the backup drive. And if you share a computer, make sure your private content is secure, because another user with administrator rights may have access. Programs like 7-Zip can pack away confidential files in encrypted archives.

Some lawyers suggest including a digital executor in your will. This person is responsible for carrying out your wishes for your online content. This is no guarantee the content will be disclosed, they said, but it may help if laws eventually change.

“What would you want them to do if you were allowed to do it?” Ms. Hoexter said. This strategy includes creating a list of your online accounts, with passwords included, she said, and storing it where you can update it easily and your digital executor can find it.

Divulging your passwords is risky, of course, even to someone you trust. But there is no simple way to do this securely while ensuring your passwords are current.

Numerous online services offer features that can transfer passwords and other personal data after you die. PasswordBox, a password manager that hooks into your web browser, has a transfer feature called Legacy. SecureSafe, based in Zurich, offers a tool for transferring passwords.

Of course, putting information like that online exposes it to hackers, government snoops or even the unforeseen security bug.

Instead, you may choose to store passwords on your computer. Many programs are available, including Password Safe and KeePass. There are also encrypted portable devices like SplashID Key Safe. You can stash one in a fireproof box and give your master password to a friend or your lawyer.

The law may one day catch up with technology. But in the meantime, it’s wise to make sure you’re using technology to deal with the dilemmas technology has created.

What is Digital Estate Planning and Why Do I Need it?

What are digital assets?

Estate planning and administration professionals cannot ignore the ubiquity of digital assets. 2012 saw global sales of digital music amount to $5.6 billion and in some markets, including the US, India, Norway and Sweden, digital music sales exceeded packaged music sales. Meanwhile, e‐book sales represented an estimated 16%, and growing, of all book sales in Canada in 2012.2 Almost 18 million Canadians, more than half of the population, has an active Facebook account. The Bitcoin virtual currency has been featured regularly in the news as its exchange value skyrocketed from approximately USD$100 to USD$1200 late in 2013, before falling off dramatically again.

The term “digital assets” is used in different ways by different people. In a narrow sense, a digital asset has been defined as “any item of text or media that has been formatted into a binary source that includes the right to use it.”  In a broader sense, digital assets include all of the electronic “possessions” an individual may have, including emails, digital photos, videos, tweets, texts, songs and e‐books, as well as online account information for websites or programs such as Facebook, LinkedIn, bank accounts, PayPal and others.5 In this broader sense, digital assets are sometimes referred to as a “digital estate” or “digital legacy”.

Digital assets have three distinct elements:

  1. A digital file or record. This is the data that constitutes the content of the asset.
  2. The right to use the file or record. It has been noted that if there is no right to use a file or record, then it should not be characterized as an asset.Rights of use may derive from authorship or other ownership of the content (for example, emails or original documents), or may be granted by a licence from the owner or a third party licensor (as with most digital music or e‐books).
  3. A method of access. Assets may be categorized into (a) physically controllable digital assets (PCDA) which are stored on hardware to which the owner has access, and (b) controlled access digital assets (CADA) stored “in the cloud” on servers belonging to third party service providers and accessible on‐line with the use of a username and password.

Because the law applicable to digital assets is still developing, digital present unique challenges to executors, administrators, attorneys and committees. In addition, planning strategies for digital assets are rapidly evolving as the law, the e‐service industry, and user awareness of estate planning issues all mature.